Posts Tagged ‘vs’
Posted by picard578 on October 1, 2016
Dassault Rafale and Saab Gripen are both multirole fighter aircraft of canard-delta configuration produced in Europe. Rafale was designed to replace seven different aircraft previously in French service, while Gripen was designed for guerilla warfare against a superior enemy. This comparison will use Gripen C. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons, Weapons Systems Analysis | Tagged: Dassault Rafale vs Saab Gripen, Gripen, Rafale, Rafale vs Gripen, vs | 45 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on December 21, 2015
Canada is a Western country that at the first look has most at common with Russia. It is huge, but vast majority of its population is concentrated in a narrow swath of land to the south, near the US-Canadian border. It borders United States to the south and west, while to the east is rest of the NATO and to the north is inhospitable Arctic, with its vast natural riches and strategic importance.
Defense of northern Canada depends mostly on three or four forward operating locations – fourth one is the only with permanently assigned squadron, and that one consists of transport aircraft. Only the far east and south of Canada have proper air bases. CF-18s are based in Bagotville to the extreme south-east and Cold Lake to the south-west. Extreme north is patrolled by long-range patrol squadrons using CP-140 Aurora aircraft; no fighter aircraft are present there on a continuous basis, despite primary mission of Canadian fighter jets being to patrol Canadian airspace. Main warning system is a chain of radar stations making up the North Warning System (DEW Line). Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Weapons Systems Analysis | Tagged: Canada, F-18E, F-35, fighter aircraft, fighter for Canada, fighter selection, Gripen, Gripen NG, JAS-39, lightning II, Rafale, SAAB Gripen, Super Hornet, Typhoon, vs | 22 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on December 11, 2015
F-15 and F-16 are two fighters that came out of programmes started after the Vietnam war demonstrated clear inadequacy of BVR-only designs then in service. When it became obvious that high agility is a necessary characteristic of modern fighter aircraft, F-15 project was revamped in order to give it better agility. LWF project was also started, and resulted in F-16 and F-18. F-16 was designed around John Boyd’s energy maneuverability theories, with low drag and high sustained turn rate. However, USAF did not want a dedicated dogfighter, especially since it could steal light from high-cost F-15; as a result, they turned F-16 into a multirole platform despite it being far less suited for the role than the F-15 (which was later acknowledged with the F-15E). This led to weight increases and loss of maneuverability. Currently, main variants in service are F-15C and F-16C, and these two will be compared by default, unless noted otherwise.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Eagle vs Viper, F-15 Eagle, F-15 vs F-16, F-16 Fighting Falcon, F-16 Viper, vs | 27 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on November 1, 2015
This article will compare two medium-weight Eurocanards. Both aircraft trace their origins to a joint European project. In 1970s, France, Germany and United Kingdom realized a requirement for new fighter aircraft. By 1979, TKF-90 concept with cranked delta wing and close-coupled canard was developed. British engineers rejected thrust vectoring but agreed with overall concept. Same year MBB and BAe presented a formal proposal for collaborative fighter to their respective governments, and in October of the year Dassault joined the ECF team. National prototypes were constructed, with France constructing ACX, Rafale’s precursor, and UK constructing single-engined P.106 (which resembled Gripen) and P.110 (twin-engined fighter). All three proposals were of close-coupled canard-delta configuration. West Germany continued to develop TKF-90 concept, based around combination of thrust vectoring and long arm canards. In 1981 project collapsed; while Dassault’s demand for design leadership was granted, France opted out for two reasons. First, it was to preserve Snecma’s technological level and ability to design engines (new fighter would use British engines). Second, France insisted on new fighter being carrier-capable, whereas other nations had no such requirement. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons | Tagged: Dassault Rafale, dassault rafale vs eurofighter typhoon, EF-2000, Eurofighter Typhoon, Rafale, Rafale vs EF-2000, Rafale vs Eurofighter, rafale vs typhoon, Typhoon, vs | 74 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on October 21, 2015
F-35 is intended to replace the F-16 and is promoted as F-16s successor. However, closer look reveals that this is not true. While the F-16 was designed as daytime visual-range dogfighter, F-35 was always intended to be a multirole aircraft with primary focus on air-to-ground missions and limited air-to-air performance. This did not stop Lockheed Martin from advertising the F-35 as a dogfighter, before its obvious inability to actually achieve high maneuverability forced them to change rhetorics.
This comparison will use both F-16A and F-16C for comparison, where applicable. When not noted otherwise, data will be assumed to apply to either both versions or only F-16C. F-35 used for comparison will be F-35A, since it is a standard model and is intended to replace the F-16 (F-35B being a replacement for AV-8 and F-35C being a replacement for F-18).
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons | Tagged: F-16, f-16 vs f-35, F-35, fighting falcon, Joint Strike Fighter, lightning II, viper, vs | 73 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on October 11, 2015
This article will compare upcoming Russian PAK FA with US F-22, since both air single-purpose heavyweight air-to-air fighters. However, since PAK FA is still in a prototype stage, article will by its nature be incomplete. I should also note that while some use the term “Raptorski” for PAK FA, it is entirely inaccurate. In fact, while the F-22 clearly draws its basic design from its F-15 predecessor, utilizing some aerodynamic advances introduced by the F-16 (such as aerodynamically unstable design and LERX), PAK FA in the same measure draws its basic design from Su-27. F-22, like the F-15, has two closely set engines, air intakes on sides of the cockpit and classical wing-tail surfaces with shoulder-mounted wing. Both have standard armament of eight missiles and M61 20 mm rotary gun. Su-27 and PAK FA on the other hand both utilize large LERX, wing-body blending and spaced podded engines. They also have basic standard armament of six missiles and 30 mm revolver cannon. If comparison should be drawn, then F-22 can be described as a stealth!F-15, and PAK FA as a stealth!Su-27, as neither presents clear design departure from their predecessor that the F-16 did. They are also both hugely complex to produce due to their stealth designs, and as a result both US and Russia have decided to supplement them with large fleets of 4,0 (and, in Russia’s case, 4,5) generation fighters.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in technology, weapons | Tagged: F-22, F-22 Raptor, PAK FA, PAK FA vs F-22, PAK FA vs Raptor, Raptor, T-50, T-50 vs F-22, vs | 93 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on September 11, 2015
This article will compare Rafale C and F-35A. Both aircraft have similar, almost identical purposes: they are to replace most other fixed wing aircraft types in use by their respective air forces. Both have land-based and carrier versions. But there are major differences in actual approach, and in the final product. While Rafale’s maneuverability is undisputed, it is often-ignored fact is that F-35 was advertised as a highly-maneuverable dogfighter, before its obvious inability to actually achieve high maneuverability forced Lockheed Martin to change rhetorics. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons | Tagged: Dassault Rafale, Dassault Rafale vs F-35, Dassault Rafale vs F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Dassault Rafale vs F-35 Lightning II, F-35, F-35 Lightning II, rafale vs f-35, Rafale vs JSF, Rafale vs Lightning II, vs | 99 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on September 1, 2015
This article will compare a theoretical FLX concept with the F-35 JSF. Hence, it is more than just a comparison of different aircraft. Rather, it is a comparison of results of two different approaches. FLX is a thoroughbred air-superiority fighter, while the F-35 is a jack-of-all-trades (supposed to be; its design imperatives were in-theatre strike and battlefield interdiction). FLX uses an integrated design approach where each piece of technology used has very clear purpose within FLXs operational concept, while the F-35 is an exercise in cramming every possible piece of “high technology” into one airframe. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: F-35, FLX vs F-35, lightweight air superiority fighter, lightweight fighter vs F-35, vs | 33 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on December 6, 2014
This article will compare several engines used in modern fighter aircraft: EJ200 (Typhoon), M88 (Rafale B/C/M), RM-12 (Gripen A/B/C/D), F-135 (F-35A/B/C), F-119 (F-22A), F404-GE-402 (F-18C/D), F-414-400 (F-18E/F, Gripen E/F), AL-31F (Su-27, Su-30, J-11). Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in technology | Tagged: AL-31, AL-31F, AL-41F1A, comparision, EJ200, EJ230, engine, F-119, F-135, F-404-GE-402, F-414, F-414-400, F-414EPE, F404, F404-GE-402, F414, fighter aircraft, fuel consumption, hours, IR signature, jet engine, M88, M88-2, M88ECO, maintainability, maintenance downtime, reliability, RM-12, service life, thrust to drag, thrust to weight, vs | 86 Comments »
Posted by picard578 on August 30, 2014
Nature of air to air combat
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
Fighter aircraft exist to destroy other aircraft, and allow other aircraft to carry out their missions without interference from enemy fighter aircraft. That being said, there exists a colloqial – and incorrect – use of term “fighter aircraft” as being applicable to any tactical aircraft, even those that are primarly or exclusively designed for ground attack, such as the A-10 and the F-35. Task of the aircraft is to enable pilot to bring weapons systems in position for a successful kill.
You never make a big truck and tomorrow make it a race car. And you never can make a big bomber and the next day a . . . fighter. The physical law means that you need another airplane. . . . You should do one job and should do this job good.
—Colonel Erich “Bubi” Hartmann, GAP Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in weapons | Tagged: compared with, comparision, Dassault Rafale, EF-2000, Eurofighter Typhoon, F-22, F-35, fighter aircraft, Gripen, gripen c, HAL Tejas, j-10, J-11, JAS-39, JAS-39C, JF-17, lightning II, modern fighter aircraft, modern fighters, Rafale, Raptor, SAAB Gripen, Su-30, Su-35, Typhoon, vs | 88 Comments »