Defense Issues

Military and general security

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Secular Talk’s unrestrained dishonesty

Posted by picard578 on March 10, 2017

The Aussie Conservative Blog

Some weeks ago, Kyle Kulinski of Secular Talk released a grossly inaccurate video regarding Islam in America which deserves critical attention. As Kulinski is a young, increasingly popular youtuber, it seems appropriate to deconstruct the work of this leading ‘progressive’ voice, to demonstrate why the Left is so wrong about modern Islamist infiltration.

In fairness, Kulinski has in part has shown to possess a distaste for political correctness and contrived Leftist outrage.

Moreover, he claims to be ‘loyal to the facts’, and this was evident as Kulinski thoroughly exposed the flaws of Hillary Clinton in 2016 election cycle.

Nevertheless, in this case he is terribly wrong, arrogant, and betraying of his supposed ‘liberal principles’ in order to avoid raising the truth about Islam in America.

As I did some weeks ago in my review of Yassmin Abdel- Magied, I will proceed to list and explain the misleading aspects of his video, and then post the whole video at the…

View original post 681 more words

Advertisements

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Is Islam Destroying the European Union?

Posted by picard578 on February 28, 2017

Multiculturalism is a plutocratic ploy. People without identity are easily manipulated, and multiculturalism (plus moral relativism) destroys identity and any semblance of a coherent social structure. By doing this it prevents any possibility of an actual democracy existing. By purpoting that all cultures are equally valuable, it endorses islamic intellectual fascism and places it level with Enlightment. But in practice, multiculturalists do not really believe that all cultures are equally valuable: they believe that all cultures are more valuable than Western one, and they believe that because they do not know history. Western educational system teaches people of Western slavery, but remains silent about far worse slavery that has existed – and still does – in Islamic countries. It teaches people of Western colonialism, but does not say that it was islamic imperialism which forced the West to embark on its colonial endeavour. Half a truth is the worst lie there is. By destroying civilization in this way, it enables plutocracy. For this reason, modern Left is the greatest ally that plutocracy has – and most don’t even realize it.

Nazism is used as a disparaging label against those who oppose multiculturalism, despite the fact that both Nazism and multiculturalism have the same root. They are two sides of the same coin, but brainwashed ideologues are too stupid to see it. But multiculturalism leads, invariably, to monoculturalism: by its very nature it is merely a transitional state. Only monocultural societies are stable enough for extended existence, and multicultural societies will bath in conflict and blood until monocultural equilibrium is achieved. And unless something is done about it – and quickly – this end state will, in Western Europe, mean islamofascist totalitarianism.

And this is precisely what plutocrats want. Conflict is conductive for plutocracy, because people are too busy fighting and surviving to care about what elites do (those more interested in how plutocrats utilize conflict for their own needs should read Naomi Klein’s “Shock Doctrine”). Multiculturalism is lethal to democracy because it causes conflict, and thus advances plutocracy. But since plutocracy controls the government – legislature, executive and judiciary alike – anyone who does not toe the multicultural line is declared a “Nazi” and faces persecution (formal or not). This despite the fact that Nazis were gloriously multicultural, as explained in my “Nazi roots of multiculturalism” article, published some months back.

Brexit itself is not an alienation. It is a consequence of alienation, of alienation of EUs bureocracy from the people it is supposed to represent. Brusselcrats do not represent the people, they do not care about the people and are in fact doing anything they can to cause continent-wide armed conflict (through importation of islamofascism). Brexit is a rebellion against illegitimate plutocracy ruling the European Union (of course, Britain itself has proud plutocratic history, so it may be merely an exchange – one evil for another).

Patrice Ayme's Thoughts

Is Islam Already Deconstructing Europe? Yes: consider Brexit.

I would not have thought this, that Fundamentalist Islam was already devouring Europe, a year ago, or any time before: I would have laughed derisively. Now I am not laughing anymore. Meanwhile there was Brexit.

Brexit was a first blatant revolt against the established order. The next blatant revolt was the colossal sweep of Donald Trump’s electoral victory: Trump controls the presidency, the Senate, the Congress, and most states (and the army, by putting the key generals in his government, and soon Trump will control the Supreme Court). Trump does not like the European Union (at least not as an alter ego of the USA; an independent Scotland may well suit his golf courses…)  Trump is a rebellious Pluto threatening the plutocracy, the ultimate horror, haunting plutocracy, ever there is plutocracy, and it plots.

Meanwhile the so-called judges, all…

View original post 2,606 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

The Regressive Left’s takeover of our Defence Force

Posted by picard578 on February 26, 2017

Politically correct insanity has made its way into Australian military.

The Aussie Conservative Blog

The Leftist war on traditional norms and its interminable yearning to force political agendas down the throats of ordinary Australians, is an unfortunate trend.

However, for the Regressive Left to distract our military by proselytizing them into various radical beliefs, is something else.

Put simply, the Left’s symbolic, politically correct crusades must not be allowed to further infect our Defence Force, which sadly looks more like an agency for Multicultural Integration, Gender Fluidity and Organic Sustainability, than an organisation responsible for safeguarding our nation’s security.

“By promoting diversity over fighting ability the Army is alienating its warriors”, Daily Telegraph, February 25, 2017:

Five years after the former Army chief and former Sex Discrimination Commissioner Liz Broderick launched a social engineering experiment aimed at stamping out the male “Anglo Saxon” warrior culture, the troops are unimpressed.

The top brass might have drunk the feminist Koolaid of “Pathway to Change” and its mutant offshoots, but most of the people they…

View original post 871 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Seven Stars and Seven Crowns: A Catholic Monarchist’s Perspective on The Lord of the Rings

Posted by picard578 on February 25, 2017

The Fellowship of The King

     The great Catholic author J.R.R. Tolkien once described his masterpiece The Lord of the Rings as a “story is cast in terms of a good side, and a bad side, beauty against ruthless ugliness, tyranny against kingship, moderated freedom with consent against compulsion that has long lost any object save mere power…” Of all these, the battle between Kingship and Tyranny is one of the most deeply Catholic themes in the story. It is also one of the most obvious.

     Most Catholics who have read The Lord of Rings will rightly recognize in these fictional histories the figure of Aragorn, the prophesied King, as a type2 of our Lord Jesus Christ, who will return like Aragorn to reclaim His Kingdom. Yet these same Catholics will often overlook a more hidden meaning in the portrayal of Kingship in The Lord of the Rings for the simple reason that we…

View original post 1,327 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

How Did EUROPE Become So SUPERIOR?

Posted by picard578 on February 23, 2017

One important aspect in Europe’s domination was its fragmentation. Combination of cultural diversity and political fragmentation enabled it rapid advancement, which placed it into position to culturally and politically dominate the world. It did lead to conflicts, but without conflicts there is no change. Today, Europe is working on a self-annihilation, spurred on by mentality caused by the guilt complex forced onto Europe by modern progressives. That guilt complex is caused by not knowing the history, and permeated by plutocracy’s interest in destroying advanced culture. Multiculturalism leads to cultural and societal annihilation, returning humans to stupid animals they were long time ago. Yet any protests against multiculturalism are met with accusations of xenophobia and racism, in order to prevent a reasonable debate. Dogmas and dogmatics do not like the debate, because it might force them to become enlightened. So they stop it through ideology and political correctness. Today’s West is on the road of self-destruction, precisely because it does not have the diversity, primarily diversity of ideas, that it once had.

Ancient China is a good example of progress through fragmentation. It developed huge array of technological devices, many of which were – much later – independently developed in Europe. Gunpowder rockets, printing press and many other advancements were developed. But that development stopped, and China got conquered – by Mongols, and then by Europeans. Reason? Formation of the empire. China united, became big and powerful… but it also became sluggish and unresponsive. Its size protected it from reality and from change. In the end it collapsed on itself. Same thing is happening in Europe today, the ever-increasing political integration of the continent through the European union is throwing the continent into political, cultural and economic regression. This integration was largely helped by the US plutocracy, and looking at Brexit one can see how many plutocrats tried to prevent it. Especially George Soros, the most visible plutocrat and the most extrovert agent of plutocracy, cried bloody murder about British exit. This is indicative of how plutocracy feels about integrations in general. They do not want independence, they do not want national self-determination, and they especially do not want the advancement.

Latin Roman Empire did not advance much. Their advancements were taken from the huge number of small(ish) tribes they fought. Roman sword, gladius, came from Spain (it is often called the “Spanish sword”). Another sword, spatha (cavalry sword, later adopted by infantry), was taken from the Celts. The entire concept of iron working and iron weapons originated with the Celts, and later was adapted through the known world. Greece made impressive advances in natural sciences, culture and philosophy, and was divided among city-states for the most of its ancient history. Cultural and political pluralism produced pluralism of inventions. Similar thing occured in India, where huge number of small kingdoms competed among themselves – “Arabic numbers”, algebra, and many other inventions were made in India, only to be stolen by Muslim conquerors and then brought to Europe. Muslim empires on the other hand can boast of no progress, other than what they stole from others. Even the car bombs were invented by Western terrorists. Part of the reason is certainly religious dogmatism, but more important was cultural homogeinity created by Islam. Islam is a perfect war religion, and it imposes single culture and single mind upon the conquered people. This singularity then halts any progress in its tracks. And what Islam had done for the Arabic world, multiculturalism is doing for the West.

European colonialism, which is now threatening to destroy Europe, was not the cause of the European advancement. It was a consequence of the advancement, originating in the need for resources and markets that said advancement produced. But today’s people care not for truth or history; and so it became politically correct to believe that everything bad came from the West, and that Western civilization has to be replaced. Political correctness is in fact the enemy of advancement. As noted before, advancement can only happen through plurality and pluralism. This is because cultural pluralism produces the plurality of ideas. The more different ideas are produced and explored, the faster the advancement happens. But any idea, especially a new one, is insulting to somebody. If one fears insulting other people, one will not express new ideas and may not even produce them. This fear of insulting and being insulted is the very basis of political correctness, it is in fact a definition of political correctness. And just like any other kind of (intellectual) fascism, it is lethal to any sort of advancement.

———-

MGRA: Make Reason Great Again! Europe is an emerging phenomenon, now towering over the entire planet, from her possessions, colonies (Africa, Americas, Oceania, much of Eurasia), and mental grip (w…

Source: How Did EUROPE Become So SUPERIOR?

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

Islamophobia Is Historically Justified

Posted by picard578 on February 17, 2017

“Phobia” means “fear”, whereas “phillia” means “love”. Islamophobia – fear of Islam – is historically and logically justified. To fear something dangerous is only logical, and cannot be called hate. Conversely, Islamophillia is a type of the Stockholm syndrome that the Left has long engaged in. It is not generally spoken about, but mainstream Left has a tendency to worship mass murderers – much like radical Right and radical Left. This is seen though many T-shirts with image of mass murdered Fidel Castro being sold. Has anyone seen T-shirts with Adolf Hitler or Ante Pavelic? Probably not. So Prophet Muhammad is merely one in a pantheon of mass murderers being worshipped by modern West, from Constantine the Great to Napoleon.

Patrice Ayme's Thoughts

With Islam, As With All: No Maximal Context, No Maximally Wise Truth:

Christianism, whatever its merit, was a horrendous system of ideas. Getting rid of its rule is how we should define the end of the Middle Ages. However, all along, Christianism was rarely the master. Roman secular law, was the basic organizing principle (at least for the Franks, and their paraconsistent Salic law, written by Roman lawyers; it’s this legal superiority which empowered the imperial supremacy of the Franks, ultimately.)

When Muhammad took control of Mecca, he had to concede that Mecca’s main industry, religion, would be preserved. That required him to preserve some element of the Pagan religion prior, with its 360 deities, presided by the Moon. Hence the symbolic role of the Moon in Islam. We of course love the Moon, mosques, and even a few ideas of Islam... When Muhammad took control of Mecca, he had to concede that Mecca’s main industry, religion, would be preserved. That required him to preserve some element of the Pagan religion prior, with its 360 deities, presided by the Moon. Hence the symbolic role of the Moon in Islam. We of course love the Moon, mosques, and even a few ideas of Islam…

Recently, the self-contradicting haters of the self-adulating, self-described…

View original post 1,422 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Why I’m conservative rather than libertarian

Posted by picard578 on February 15, 2017

This would more or less apply to myself as well. In fact, Croatian conservativism has long had a social component, having developed in predominantly rural 19th century Croatia where cooperation was the key for survival. While accepting of the principles of individual independence and responsibility, Croatian conservativism also demands a high measure of social responsibility – towards one’s own family, people and the country. In Croatia, it is generally the Left who are socially irresponsible – a problem made that much worse by the fact that both major parties (SDP and HDZ) are leftist neocommunist parties deeply rooted into Titoism.

The Aussie Conservative Blog

I firmly support the need to emphasizecommon ground, rather than differences when collaborating with individuals of differing ideologies.

So whilst constructive dialogueis important, andI consider parts of conservatismand libertarianism essentialto my own ideology, I am first and foremosta conservative person.

This is not to state that I am incapable of changing my positions on issues over time, but for now I have a firmly rooted, mostly conservativeset of beliefs.

But why is that?

Upon reflection, the primary reason I was drawn to conservatism, was my beliefin being part of a broader collective. Yes, I favour lower taxes, private property rights, some libertarian principles, and am waryof the dangers governmental overreach can pose.

But from a young age, it wasn’t economic growth, or individualism that really graspedmy fascination.

Instead, my passion for preserving our great country emerged, as well as forpromoting the traditional order whichdeveloped modern Australia.

In all my travels…

View original post 445 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Survival of the luckiest

Posted by picard578 on January 21, 2017

Darwin’s theory of evolution holds that the living being evolve through natural selection. More adaptable and superior species survive, and less adaptable species perish. Thus evolution within various species – how well they adapt to changes in the environment – has a decisive impact to evolution of the species. In the end, better adapted and more capable species survive, and the ultimate and inevitable product of evolutionary progress are modern humans. This theory has also been adapted by various social ideologies (Social Darwinism), such as Nazism and neoliberalism. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | 6 Comments »

Czech Republic has the right idea

Posted by picard578 on January 10, 2017

Czechs are smarter than the brainwashed Western Europe. Groups of apes have always been killing each others and this has not changed when apes evolved into humans. That is why multiculturalism does not work. And Islam is the ultimate war ideology, one which encourages its followers to kill everybody else. So Europe has to prepare for war for its very survival.

The Aussie Conservative Blog

In contrast to the failures of Western Europe, the Czech Republic still has some good sense, in speaking candidly about how to deal with the Islamist threat.

“Czech government tells its citizens how to fight terrorists: Shoot them yourselves”, Washington Post, January 5, 2016:

A couple of months ago, Czech President Milos Zeman made an unusual request: He urged citizens to arm themselves against a possible “super-Holocaust” carried out by Muslim terrorists.
Never mind that there are fewer than 4,000 Muslims in this country of 10 million people — gun purchases spiked. One shop owner in East Bohemia, a region in the northern center of the Czech Republic, told a local paper that people were scared of a “wave of Islamists.”
Now the country’s interior ministry is pushing a constitutional change that would let citizens use guns against terrorists. Proponents say this could save lives if an attack occurs…

View original post 99 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

How the Crusades Saved Europe

Posted by picard578 on January 7, 2017

Crusades saved Europe from being conquered by the most lethal ideology in history – Islam. Unlike islamic jihad, Crusades were not offensive wars of conquest, nor they were religious extremism or fanaticism. They were a defensive response to a life-threatening situation.

swissdefenceleague

How the Crusades Saved Europe

The Battle of Vienna, September Eleven 1683 (movie)

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments »