Defense Issues

Military and general security

  • Follow Defense Issues on
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 272 other followers

  • July 2018
    M T W T F S S
  • Categories

How Islam led to world wars

Posted by picard578 on July 2, 2018

Islam has, maybe not directly caused, but definitely set into motion events which ultimately led to the World Wars. In short, Islamic expansion cut off trade routes to the East and forced Europe to (eventually) turn to Atlantic. This led to discovery of the New World, which was then settled, giving rise to great colonial empires (and also heavy-duty slavery, started by islamic merchants selling slaves to Europeans – not that it was anything new at the time, slavery existed even in Merovingian Empire). Colonialism and colonial competition (not directly nationalism, as is often said) then caused global conflicts: Seven Years War, Napoleonic Wars, World War I and World War II. Specifically, Seven Years War led to Napoleonic Wars. Napoleonic Wars eventually helped cause national unification of Germany, which became industrial power, leading it to conflict with West over the colonies, which led to World War I. World War I was never properly wrapped up, and so caused World War II.

Islam has appeared in 7-th century, after a man by name of Muhammad decided he is not rich enough and decided to dupe a bunch of people with God to pillage for him. He was supremely successful, and Islam spread rapidly. Within decades, whole of Middle East and North Africa were conquered. Eventually, in 15th century, Ottoman Emirate captured Constantinople. Islam also invaded Central Asia, cutting off the overland route to the East. Afterwards, islamic armies continued their advance westward until finally being stopped at the gates of Vienna in 1683., specifically on September 11, 1683. Old overland route for trade with East now went through islamic territory. But in 1492., Spanish finally liberated the pennisula from islamic occupation, and Cristopher Columbus went sailling West to find the new passage East. This led to discovery of Americas.

Europe itself (in geopolitical terms) is product of Islam. Up until the expansion of Islam, there was no “European” civilization, but Mediterranean one, primarily centered around Eastern Mediterranean and tightly connected to the Fertile Crescent and through it to India and China. Greek civilization is a product of Egyptian one, Greek philosophers and artists had been to Egypt (as is obvious when comparing art: kuros, and other early Greek art, shows clear Egyptian influences). There was in fact an entire civilizational system along the Silk Road: Rome/Greece – Persia – India – China – Korea – Japan.

Islam destroyed all of it. It conquered Arabia, Near East (Middle East for Americans), Northern Africa, Persia and parts of India. It conquered as far as Soviet -stans. This last act in particular severed the Silk Road, and forced Europe to look West. First came expansion northwards: into British islands, Germany, Scandinavia and Russia (Byzantines), turning former Mediterranean civilization into European one, and giving birth to modern Europe. Then, after the route through Central Asia was severed, came the western expansion: Americas, and later Australia, Africa and Asia. Balance of power and trade shifted from Mediterranean to Atlantic, and this led to global expansion and first wave of globalization. It is not incorrect to say that European colonialism is a product of Islam.

This colonialism in turn led to a series of wars. First came the Seven Years War. This war was what made Britain into great power, but it was initiated by a conflict over colonies between Britain and France. Conflict started in 1754. when British attacked French positions in North America, and – much like World War II – it quickly spread to encompass most of Europe and much of the world into what became the first world war. The war ended in expansion of British Empire and destabilization of France, which ultimately led to the French Revolution and the next global conflict – Napoleonic Wars.

Napoleonic Wars are a continuation of French Revolution, itself caused by the Seven Years War. French Revolution did not last long, and as revolutions are prone to doing, it soon turned into a dictatorship by Napoleon Bonaparte. French expansion, even though it started from wars of self-defense, destabilized the continent and threatened other powers. This destruction of balance of power precluded peaceful settlement, and ensured that wars started in the Revolution would continue, both in Europe and in French colonies. After 10 years of Napoleonic Wars, Napoleon was defeated, borders redrawn, and both Europe and the world were free from major conflicts for next hundred years.

First and Second World Wars follow a nearly identical pattern. First World War was started by a conflict over colonies – rising Germany wanted resources and slaves to exploit, and established Britain and France did not want to give up their own resources and slaves. This led to formation of various alliances, which after some shuffling settled into well-known Triple Entente and Central Powers. The entire continent was a powder bag, and was easily set off by a single spark provided by Serb imperialist activists. The war led to dissolution of German, Austrian, Ottoman and Russian Empires, but solved little – colonies and colonial powers remained, and heavy-handed peace terms forced on Germany bred resentment.

World War II was little more than delayed epilogue of World War I. Germany, humiliated by the peace treaty – very different from light handling France received post-Napoleon – vied for a revenge. This in turn destabilized and illegitimized the Wiemar Republic, and everything was worsened by the Great Depression. Nazism was little but expression of uncertainty and insecurity caused by this, even if expressed in extreme terms (and even then, it was much less extreme back in 1930s than it seems today). In Asia, Japan itself embarked onto colonialist route, placing it at collision course with established colonial powers. Overall, Nazism, militarism etc. that are typically listed as causes of World War II were largely incidental – true cause of war was, again, colonialism.

Overall, Islam caused European colonialism, and European colonialism caused world wars. Normally stated causes of world wars such as nationalism are at best minor, if not irrelevant. Likewise, it is doubtful that United Nations, EU and other such institutions prevented World War III. It is unclear whether World War III had even been prevented in the first place – between 1814. and 1914. there were 100 years, whereas World War II happened “only” 73 years ago. However, if it had been prevented, it was not due to European Union. What prevented next European conflict was decolonization and transfer of balance of power from Europe to North America and, now, Pacific-Indian ring. Post-World War II Europe and its powers are simply not important enough to warrant a continent-wide conflict, and even if such a conflict had happened, they would not have had the power or influence to drag the rest of the world into war with them. If there is next world war – a prospect more likely than many think, thanks to globalized economy – it will begin in the Pacific.

9 Responses to “How Islam led to world wars”

  1. Bill said

    left out the 9 crusades. also the vatican and their agendas.


    • Picard578 said

      First Jihad – AD 628, Muhammad against Mecca
      First conflict between Islam and Roman Empire – AD 634, Muslim invasion of Sirya
      First conflict between Islam and West – AD 711, Islamic invasion of Spain

      Notice anything? In all three “first contact” scenarios, Muslims were the aggressors. Crusades were a response to Muslim aggression, specifically a response to request for aid from Roman Emperor Alexios I Komnenos, though he may not have intended a crusade to happen – he probably hoped for mercenaries.

      In any case, Crusades did not have much of an impact on anything. They did not help Roman Empire that much (with possible exception of the First Crusade); the only decisive Crusade was probably Fourth one, which basically destroyed the Roman Empire, but that had nothing to do with Pope – it had to do with Venice and internal politics in Constantinople.


      • Bill said

        When did the Romans sack Palestine/Judea ? 63 bce.

        Also consider Alexander the great before that.

        West has been invading the east longer than the opposite – thats my point.

        There is no difference between jihad and crusade.


        • Dear Picard: Lots to say, lots, lots, lots. I have covered much of this, dispersed in many essays.

          Unconquered Europe: A Short History
          Europe has been unconquered for 3,000 years.
          Hordes of Germanoids, Mongoloids (Alans, Huns, Avars, Mongols), Islamists and Nordics tried, injured, but, in the end, were eradicated as influencers.

          One can’t have a civilization without a successful defense: had the Mongols succeeded in one of their two attempted landing in Japan, Japanese civilization would have disappeared.
          The retort to this is that the Mongols conquered China and China didn’t disappear. However, The Ming were conquered 2 centuries later by the Manchus. The Mongol conquest itself was probably already down from conquest by the Jurchen and a Buddhist empire (Xia Xia).

          One thing you expose above is called “Pirenne thesis” (1930s): Islam blocked the trading road to East Asia (no more silk, spices used for conservation), and blocked the Levant (so no more paper), and Egypt, Cyrenaica, North Africa (no more grain). (Pirenne said) The blockade caused a depression. It’s certainly true.

          It is also true that the attack by Muhammad and his superstitious ideology (“Islam”) was a deliberate world war, and an attack against civilization, both the Greco-Roman one and Persia. Muhammad says as much explicitly, he points out that, as Rome and Persia exhausted themselves, it’s the first such occasion in 1,000 years (that was entirely correct).

          Persian religion (Zoroastrianism) and civilization were wiped out by Islam. Just as the Nazis got lucky in 1939, the Arabs got lucky against the Roman field army. In either cases, overconfidence of the French and their Roman ancestors played a crucial role. After the battle which wiped out the Roman army, the Arabs killed all the males in greater Syria.

          The Franks viewed, correctly, Islam as an heresy of Christianism (more exactly, of Arianism, which Constantine had declared heretical). The idea of Francia was moderation in religion, so, as early as 650 CE, the Franks, who had sent spies, viewed Islam for a mortal danger (it’s time to renew with the tradition).

          Islam successfully eradicated the secular legal system of the Greco-Romans from the Levant and North Africa. Islam also tried to conquer all of Europe and Rome (capital Constantinople).

          Launched by the Franks as early as Charles Martel, Charlemagne, and then the Normans, Angevins, Aragon, Catalonia, and Castile (the three of them ex-Frankish march states), the reconquista enabled to recover Spain, Italy, Mediterranean islands. Things stalled a bit when the Spanish army, ready to reconquer all of North Africa, was directed to the newly discovered Americas instead.

          The crusades were part of the reconquista. After making a deal, with Saladin, to reopen the trade routes (before 1200 CE), the semi arid, over-populated, Levant lost its allure: the Teutonic Knights packed up, and decided to conquer the heathen Prussians instead (it turned into a big holocaust). Europe turned towards the Atlantic because of technological advances. Dry cod from Norway, walrus ivory from Greenland, etc. The existence of North America was a well kept secret. Discovering islands and trade routes with the fast new ships beat going overland.

          The wars of Europe started when Aragon and then Castille decided to push the French out of the Mediterranean islands and South Italy (15C). There soon was a religious element, as France, for a while, tolerated the Protestants. (The 5 million Cathars, an early form of Protestantism, 3 centuries earlier, had been massacred to the last…) Italy erupted in war, and France fought Spain for two centuries, creating the Netherlands in an 80 years war, in the middle of this. Very fasco-Catholic Philippe II of Spain killed French (Protestant, but officially sent) colonists in the Carolinas, to the last baby…

          OK, more later, will write an essay from it…

          Liked by 1 person

        • Picard578 said

          We are discussing Islam here specifically, your “point” is non sequitur, and completely incorrect besides. Alexander the Great invaded Persia after Persia had invaded Greece a number of times. Judea itself was invaded a number of times, but first invasions came from the East – Assyrians in 720 BC. After that it was conquered or subjugated by Egypt and Babylon – in other words, first three invaders came from the East or South.

          There are many differences between Jihad and Crusades. Reward for Jihad was exclusively in the next world, whereas reward for Crusades also applied for this world (remission of sins). Crusades’ original goal was to help Roman Empire withstand Muslim attacks by opening a second front in Palestine – this didn’t work out well because of other political and social forces behind Crusades that neither Pope nor the Emperor took into account. Goal of Jihad was conquest and subjugation from the very start – look at what Muhammad did after (and even before) his escape to Medina. And many others, but I don’t want to write a bloody essay in a comment.


        • Bill said

          Mr. Clinton observed that “when the Christian soldiers took Jerusalem [in 1099], they . . . proceeded to kill every woman and child who was Muslim on the Temple Mount.” He cited the “contemporaneous descriptions of the event” as describing “soldiers walking on the Temple Mount . . . with blood running up to their knees.” This story, Mr. Clinton said emphatically, was “still being told today in the Middle East and we are still paying for it.”

          Billy out.
          (cant teach you history today…hehe)


        • Picard578 said

          Crusades were bloody, yes. There were crimes, yes. I am not denying that. But unlike first jihads (Muhammad vs Mecca), they were not unprovoked aggression.


  2. Dead Zone said

    Very interesting ! Unfortunately always in the air….


  3. larryzb said

    Britain caused the two world wars, and more people, who do their own research, are waking up to this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: