Why the British Army was so effective in 1914 – Learning lessons from Boer War

Advertisements


Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

3 replies

  1. Reblogged this on josephhokayem.

  2. I thought it was the opposite, their small size of the army before the war compared to France meant they didnt have the large numbers of mid and higher level officers to effectively plan and execute large scale operations. Before the war British army was 400K, half of which was in colonial possessions, Germans and French had universal conscription. The British tactics for trench warfare and artillery barrages were up to a year behind the French in the part of Northern France where their forces were close by

    • That is true, but British infantry was in many ways superb. For example, they had a “mad minute” – their soldiers were trained to rapidly fire their rifles, so that when Germans first attacked British positions, they thought that British had hundreds of machine guns. Of course, once the original cadre got killed, British compensated by actually deploying hundreds of machine guns.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: