TTIP is a free trade agreement that is being pushed by the United States and onto the EU. It would allow US corporations complete and unrestricted access to European markets, while denying European corporations access to US market. TTIP, and CETA, will allow all public services to be privatized. TTIP was written by the corporations, and as such it is optimized for them – giving them rights, removing obligations and destroying economic democracy and democracy in general. It is also said to liberalize one-third of global trade, which is the reason why large corporations are supporting it.
European Parliament has outright rejected a proposal by the corporate-controlled European Comission, proposal which would have allowed GMO food to enter Europe. Two-thirds of the EU member states have banned GMO food. However, TTIP will allow corporations to sue national governments if government makes a decision that might harm corporate profits. It is helped by the fact that almost all research on GMO is being done by the institutions under solid control of the same biotech companies that are trying to push forward GM food. GM food is dangerous in three primary ways. First, it causes health problems, including cancer. Second, it is patented. This means that small farmers will be unable to produce food, or will have to pay huge interests to the GMO companies – which in turn will push them completely out of the business. Third, genetic engineering causes unforeseen consequences due to lack of understanding of the genetic code; these include reduced resistance to diseases. TTIP would also remove any regulations on product safety, environmental safety and worker safety in general. It will allow government officials to get high-paid corporate directorship while still holding public positions, without any accoutability except to the corporate stock holders. Consequences? Right now, 70% of all processed foods sold in the US contain GM ingredients, and that situation will repeat itself in Europe if TTIP passes. US also allows usage of cancerogenous growth hormones in beef. REACH regulations will be repealed, with disastrous consequences – EU’s REACH bans 1.200 toxic or potentially toxic substances from being used in cosmetic products. In US, only twelve are banned. GMO food is also behind the troubles in Ukraine – eastern Ukrainian farmers having rebelled when the government tried to take their land in order to give it to corporations for producing GMO food. Neither is this the first such case – before being overthrown by the radical islamists, Gaddaffi was in negotiations with European companies to develop Libya’s food production and make it independent of the US companies. Monsanto in particular has major interests in Ukraine, wanting to use its fertile land to grow poisonous crops – Ukraine is world’s third largest exporter of corn and fifth largest exporter of wheat.
TTIP will cause economic disintegration of Europe, losses in net exports, GDP, labor income, jobs, labor share and government revenue, as well as reduction of financial stability. Whereas economic growth requires a strong policy effort in support of labor incomes, TTIP focuses on increasing benefits of stockholders at the expense of everyone else. But reducing labor incomes means reduced sales, which destroys the economic loop, bringing down the entire system into a recession (or depression). Billionaires, however, do not care about that – in fact, they would likely find a way to profit even from an economic meltdown. And that is a problem, since Western “democracies” are actually oligarchies. TTIPs Investor State Dispute Settlement mechanism (ISDS) will allow corporations to take entire countries to corporate-controlled tribunals, which will then – of course – decide in the favor of corporations, and countries will have to pay massive reparations if they in any way impede corporate profits. In fact, it is already happening. Exactly one year before the Paris attacks, France had spoken out against ISDS.
If TTIP passes, there will be many consequences. Banks will be completely out of control, food safety standards and regulations will be jettisoned. In fact, corporations will be completely free to “regulate” themselves, with no outside interference – including courts. Working conditions and product safety will be completely in hands of the corporations. Any public law impending projected profit will be dismantled via Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), in front of corporate-controlled courts; this alone will reduce national governments to useless, powerless theaters, whose decisions will be consistently overruled by the new privatized justice system. Even if governments win in front of these tribunals, they will still be liable for multi-million dollar legal bills accrued by defending from frivulous corporate lawsuits. Lawsuits in fact are nothing more than just another neoliberal mechanism for transferring money from the public to private coffins. Public services will be completely privatized, especially national health services. Nationalisation and regulation of any sector, including very troublesome financial one, will be seen as being against TTIP and ISDS. TTIP will also put an end to any protectionist policies, destroying many national economies as well as any local and small business. While corporations and their CEOs will reap huge profits, costs will be transferred from corporations to consumers, workers and the environment. All ACTA’s anti-privacy elements will be brought back. Speculative money will be completely unregulated. Corporations demanding payments from states – such as was the case with Argentina, which had to pay a billion USD in compensation to corporations after it froze insane, and quickly rising, water and energy bills – will become a rule, rather than an exception. Market competition and “economic democracy” will cease to exist, as without state intervention ad regulation, few megacorporations will create monopolies and destroy or absorb any medium and small business.
TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) is similar to TTIP, allowing corporations to completely bypass all branches of legitimate government and enforce their own sanctions. Only difference is that it goes across Pacific, as opposed to the Atlantic-crossing TTIP, but both are essentially one and the same. It removes the legislative authority from the US Congress and the White House on the range of issues. Judicial power will be surrendered to three-person tribunals where only the corporations will be allowed to sue. And targets for that will range from individual persons to the government(s), and corporations will be able to use it to counter any decision which might harm their profits (such as health and safety regulations), made by any government which signs the deal. There will be no appeals. Any worker, environmental and advocacy groups and labor unions will be blocked from suing or seeking redress. Judges in these tribunals will, as already is the case with NAFTA tribunals, also be representatives of the corporations participating in the processes. It will also increase wages disparity – top 10% will see their income increase, while everyone else’s income will be drastically reduced (note that already the richest 80 people in the world own the same amount of wealth as the world’s bottom 50%). Deal promotes outsourcing and offshoring of jobs and “flexibility” (read: deterioration) of working conditions. Offshoring will allow US and other Western corporations to use slave labor in countries such as Malaysia, to an even greater extent than they are doing right now. Environmental safety and preservation is completely ignored in the deal, allowing corporations to run amock on the environment. Deal goes beyond economics. Provisions in the deal will result in a crackdown on whistleblowers and investigative journalism, as well as allow monitoring of communications, thus harming the very basis of democracy. Russia, China and India are excluded from the deal as US (actually, US corporations) do not have a control over them yet.
This deal is dangerous to United States themselves. Foreign corporations will be able to sue the US government over policies designed to protect the local communities, just as Canada got sued over its environment protection policies.
TiSA (Trade in Services Agreement) is perhaps the most important of the triad, calling for the privatization of all the public services. Currently, 80% of the US economy is made up by the government-run services. In Europe, situation is similar. More importantly, privatization would hit the services which are absolutely crucial for functioning of the society and thus should never be outside the public control: education, health and law enforcement.
If these three agreements pass, citizens will find themselves without any form of protection from corporate predation (including murder: Michael Froman, person who wrote TTIP, TPP and TISA claimed that systematic murder of labor union organizers is not, in fact, murder, or a violation of workers’ rights. Julian Assange, whose organisation made it possible for public to even know about TTIP and what it contains, is under threat of imprisonment or murder by the US). What little of nation-state survives will be nothing more than an extension of corporations; it will be corporations themselves who will call the shots. Wages will drop down (except those of high corporate executives, whose wages will soar), working conditions deteriorate, unemployment will rise. Democracy will be completely dismantled. Prices will skyrocket, while any social security programs will be drastically scaled back or terminated. Product safety will no longer matter. Corporations will be allowed to turn the natural world into marketable products, with no regard for environmental impact. Hydraulic fracturing, using water to extract oil, will be used without regulation – in spite of its side effects, which include water and air contamination, adverse health effects and earthquakes. One company in Canada already filed NAFTA lawsuit to overturn the decision against fracking. Corporations will become more powerful than countries, capable of dictating laws and policies of any country, with no accountability at all. Small investors will disappear, and “buy-local” or “buy-[Insert country name here]” will be forbidden. World Trade Organization will have the final say in the policy creation. Jobs will be transferred to slaves in the Third World countries, such as Malaysia. Corporations will have to be paid to stop polluting. Speculative money will be free from corporate regulation. National interests will be ignored in favor of corporate ones. Nothing of which is surprising – after all, the agreements in question have been written by the corporations. They will benefit the rich class, and be a disaster for everyone else.
It is easy to predict what will happen in the end. All checks and balances against corporate irresponsibility will disappear, and corporations will only seek profit at any cost – just like in 1920s. State will not be able to intervene and stop the crisis, as Hoover and Roosevelt administrations did in the US. End result will be the economic crisis, even worse than one from 1920s – and who knows which Hitlers will rise next? And after World War III, maybe corporations will establish global corporate superstate, with riches for the few and misery for most. In such post-democratic, unregulated world, life will be a day-to-day survival challenge for most. Corporate fascism is already forming – in January 2015, three members of the WikiLeaks organisation had received notice that “Google had handed over all their emails and metadata to the United States government”. If TTIP and TPP pass, they will bring about global dictatorship, a night with no dawn.
These agreements are typically locked for twenty years or more. During that time governments and taxpayers will have to pay for corporate screwups, covering business losses for decades to come with no possibility to get out of the deals.
Unlike other European countries (especially UK), France was always relatively independent from US’ imperialistic policies. It was not very pleased about dangerous GMO food entering Europe. In 2014, it refused to join TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), a project designed to push the West into an era of open corporate fascism. TTIP would open Europe to American corporate giants, remove any form of regulations, while US markets would remain closed for European corporations. That way failling American economy could be rescued at the expense of Europe while not having to undergo any reforms which would harm plutocrats’ profits. French government recently began to threaten withdrawal from the TTIP talks, and European – including French – energy companies are continuing to actively cooperate with Russia. Major problem was ISDS, which as noted before, would directly dismantle countries’ sovereignity and allow business to challenge any legislation it does not agree with. It didn’t want to join TTIP in 2015 either, even after a visit by the EU trade comissioner, a visit which was designed to create a sense of urgency and push through the TTIP. French Parliament, unlike its plutocratic government, had refused TTIP more than once.
But threatening to pull from TTIP talks has made France an open enemy of Washington and its Wall Street overlords, as well as their puppets in the EU Commission. United States have a long history of using false flag operations to push their way, especially when it comes to destroying democracy (e.g. Iran). CIAs psychological warfare manual notes the value of killing somebody on your own side so as to have a martyr for the cause. First thing when analyzing any attack, especially terrorist one, is to ask: “Who profited from it?”. And it is precisely US and European corporations that profited most from the attacks in Paris (especially US ones). It is telling that both refugee crisis and terrorist attacks have been happening at approximate time when US are trying to force Europe to allow poisonous food to enter its markets. Coincidence? Not likely. Both the refugee crisis and attacks have placed major economic and social pressure on Europe, while at the same time pulling away the focus from what is happening “behind the scenes”. Refugee influx has been used to place proxy ISIS terrorists all across the Europe, allowing US to mount terrorist attacks in order to disrupt the public and cause it to focus on irrelevancies while TTIP and other agreements are being pushed through. If TTIP passes, corporations will take over Europe, just as they have taken over United States, and usher an era of post-democratic, totalitarian corporate world. This has all the signs of a “bread and games” circus – create games (terrorist attacks) to take away the bread (freedom and democracy). And a former US intelligence officer has admitted that most terrorists are false flag terrorists created by US security services. Charlie Hebdo attacks have also been false flag attacks. Paris attacks are simply too clean, yet also too confused and convenient to be standard terrorist attacks. Aside from coinciding with TTIP negotiations, they also coincided with climate talks. After the attacks, France turned into a police state, preventing any massive protests against the talks. And people, brainwashed by fear, have silently accepted this onset of totalitarian control.
France has fallen for the bait. It has found itself under the first curfew since the 1944. Hollande has sent an aircraft carrier to the Middle East to assist Putin against US-sponsored ISIS, which US have used to break down Syria and remove Assad. French Rafale and Mirage fighters are now slaughtering civilians from altitude, a typical US approach but a departure from French favored close combat approaches. This will help ISIS by providing it with a flood of new recruits, thus creating a neverending war. Gadaffi was removed because he tried to make Libya independent from the West, especially in regards to food production. Libya, before being destroyed, had some of the best and most widespread educational and social support systems. Eastern Ukraine rebelled because people did not want to see their land taken by a corporate-sponsored land grab (especially Monsanto had interest in it, to grow posionous GM food). This land grab was pushed forward by corporate-controlled IMF. Ukraine is the world’s third largest exporter of corn and fifth largest exporter of wheat. No wonder corporations want to conquer it, so as to use it to produce GM food.
There were other reasons for the attack as well. France was about to recognize Palestine as an independent state. A member of a Rotschild family, one of corporatist banking dynasties ruling the United States, was facing fraud charges in France for breaching tax law.
Attacks themselves have all the telltale signs of a false flag operation, and official story raises numerous questions. Mainstream media suggests that only two shooters participated in the Paris attacks, while reports mention two, three or four shooters. One witness, Pierre Marie Bertin, clearly stated that there were four shooters; any other numbers are thus later revisions by the media and/or authorities. Neither it is clear what weapons the terrorists used – were they AK-47s, or shotguns? This is despite the fact that assailants were killed by the police, and thus weapons should have been known. Some reports say that gunmen were killed, others that they were arrested. One shooter had shouted “This is for Syria!”, an allegedly arrested suspect immediately confirmed that the operation was carried out by ISIS, and not long after the attack a Russian airliner was also bombed – allegedly by ISIS. Another sign of false flag attacks is running of the drills shortly before the attacks happened – such drills happened before 9/11 attacks in US and 7/7 bombings in London, and they also did right before the Paris attacks. All the drills incidentally used the scenarios very similar to the attacks themselves. An emergency medical drill was ongoing on morning of the day when the attacks happened; moreover, it was a multi-site attack exercise involving police forces, firemen and EMTs. Drills before false flags are normal sign, as running them allows superiors to pass off any leaks of plans for an actual attack as plans for a drill – such operations are on a strict need-to-know basis, as even in the military many people, mostly soldiers of lower rank, would blow a whistle if they stumbled upon planning of a false flag operations. After the drill is over, a Coincidence Theory will be used to explain the tragic results. 9/11 attacks, Charlie Hebdo attack and the latest Paris attacks all have one thing in common – an ID document found which undoubtebly connects the perpetrators with the terrorist group being accused of carrying out the act. In the case of Paris attacks, passport found points to Syria, one place where the West has long wanted an open military intervention. Soon after finding it, passport was downgraded as having been found on a body of a Syrian refugee, in order to salvage some credibility for a made-up story. Attacks were also known well in advance, but the information was not acted upon.
Attack also took place shortly before a major climate summit that was set to take place in France. French government itself was expecting massive, potentially violent protests. New security measures passed allow the government to easily prevent or dissolute any such protests. And even before the attacks, France was a totalitarian police state almost as much as US were – albeit far more competent about it. So how did the attacks happen in the first place? And within twelve hours after the attacks, President Hollande gave three speeches. He knew names of the attackers and where there were from while the police was still putting the facts together, and accused Daesh/ISIL as a perpetrator well before any official claim came from the group. Just like the 9/11, civil rights suspensions, control of the media, increased surveillance and supression of protests quickly followed. And people, cattle that they are, are grateful for the loss of their rights and liberties in the name of “security”. Attackers were traced back to Belgium, headqarters of the secretive, dictatorial European Comission and a place where anti-TTIP protests were active. Measures put in place after the attacks will allow Belgian police to clamp down on anti-TTIP protests.
During the attacks, weapons ejected no shell casings and bullets hit the concrete with no effect whatsoever (AK-47 rounds have a steel core for penetrating body armor, meaning that they blow up large chunks of concrete and typically overpenetrate the walls). Shots produced no supersonic signature – atypical of assault rifle bullets, but typical of blanks. “Bystander” who shot the video showed no fear.
CIA director John Brennan has stated after the Paris attacks that “it is not the only option ISIS has in the pipeline.” He should know – ISIS was created by CIA in Jordan, and is very likely continuing to operate under CIA’s control. At the very least, US are continuing to train ISIS. When one takes a look at operations by ISIS, it is clear that their training is far superior than that given to the Iraqi Army. ISIS operates completely according to John Boyd’s principles, the first Arab military ever to do so (Iran is not an Arabic country). CIA-trained Chechen terrorists are now leading the ISIS, which is being funded by US allies in the Middle East – Kuwait, Quatar and Saudi Arabia. This funding is what in fact facilitated rise of the ISIS, and countries in question are still refusing to withdraw their support for ISIL. Al-Baghdadi, an alleged ISIS leader, is a lie. All the Al-Quaeda affiliates are offshots of a CIA terror operation. ISIS leaders are mostly residing in Tel Aviv, New York, Paris and London. Egyptian president, before being overthrown by the army, was also dealing with Al-Quaeda.
While Coincidence Theorists like to disparage conspiracy theories, both coincidences and conspiracies are a fact of life. They happen all the time, and only issue is deciding which event fits which theory/narrative. But more complex some chain of events is, less likely it is to be a coincidence. US Army’s 1944 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause.
France, acting on US intelligence, is now attacking ISIS – and striking empty or false targets. Bombardment campaign is actually helping ISIS, as any misses killing civilians – which are a certainty when bombing from 10.000+ ft – will create more terrorists. But in Syria, there is no moderate opposition, and there likely never was, at the very least not in numbers large enough to have any, let alone significant, impact on the outcome of fighting between the government and radicals. Only remaining forces are those under control, or allied to, the Syrian president Al-Assad, and extremist groups associated with ISIS. ISIS is being supported by Turkey (including, at times, artillery support), and in fact likely originated there. Support includes training camps and transition as well as medical care in Israel, both of which point to the ISIS having close ties with Western intelligence services, and hundreds of millions of USD in cash. Turkey also provides shelter from from which ISIS sometimes still strikes, as well as heavy equipment, including tanks and ammunition for heavy weapons. Saudi Arabia is also providing ISIS with weapons, just as it did with Jihadists in Bosnia during 1990s, and members of Saudi royal family are acting as commanders in ISIS. It is also the most significant financial support that ISIS has. Not a surprise, seeing how radical Islam (Wahhabism) is a state religion of both Saudi Arabia and ISIS, and for a long time West had used it to control Arab states; Saudi Arabia helped organizers of 9/11 attacks. West has also used radical islamic terrorists to eject USSR from Afghanistan, which gave radical Islam legitimacy and a major boost, and at least since 2011, United States have been funding the terrorist groups aimed against governments in Syria and Iraq as well as against Hezbollah in Lebanon, and now US private military contractors are training Syrian rebels in Jordan – a program on which CIA spends one billion USD per year. This training includes ISIL forces. Bombardment campaign, as noted earlier, is actually helping ISIS; A-10, the only Western CAS-capable platform other than helicopters or light attack aircraft, has only minor presence compared to homicidal fast jets. These attacks are also not coordinated with either Syrian or Iraqi/Iranian forces fighting against ISIS, making them utterly counterproductive to the stated goal of defeating ISIS. NATO never bombed ISIS’ trucks transpording crude oil to be sold in/to Turkey, except once as a coverup ops when Putin confronted them with the fact. None of the 60 ISIS’ training camps were ever bombed – despite them producing 1.000 radical islamists per month. Western coalition stood by doing nothing while ISIS took Palmira – impending attack on which was known about for a week before it actually happened.
Saudis also executed Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr, who was being used by regional powers as a balance against US influence in Saudi Arabia. After Saudis mass executions, there was no massive foreign indignation. United States also supported the Saudi invasion of Yemen. Human rights, freedom and democracy are nonexistent in Saudi Arabia – its ruling dynasty, suppored by “democratic” United States, had made sure of that. If these three things mattered to anyone, West would have invaded – or at least confronted – Saudi Arabia long before invading Iraq or Syria – but it did not.
It is also interesting to note that Al-Maliki Iraqi government was left relatively unchallenged by ISIL until it decided to close down the Saudi routes that Saudi Arabia used to supply weapons to ISIL in Syria. This decision however meant that US and its allies – Turkey, Quatar and Saudi Arabia, turned hostile, and went forward with their plot to overthrow the Iraqi government by deploying terrorists – just as they had tried in Syria, and did it in Libya.
The story about the “moderate opposition” is being used to justify arming the radical islamists. These are then used against Syria and Iran, two major Russian allies in the Middle East. US administration is cooperating with Saudi Arabia to undermine Iran and its ally, Syria. Croatia alone had sent 3.000 tons of weapons to Syrian rebels, though not all weapons came from Croatian stocks. These weapons were sent via Saudi Arabia, leaving Saudis free to distribute it to extremist groups of their own choosing, and indeed many were soon seen in the extremists’ hands. Yet Washington has known that the Al-Quaeda was the most prominent fighting group in Syria. In essence, weapons are going to the Al-Quaeda and ISIS (which can be seen from convoys of matching Toyota trucks used by ISIS), as in the entire Syria there is no moderate opposition at all; ISIS, al Nusrah, al Sham, FSA and Al Quaeda are one and the same. These groups also control all of the oil fields that the Europe is now buying Syrian oil from. And while Europe is providing cash, United States are providing flour for bakeries controlled by the rebels. That way, Syrians do not even notice that the aid is coming from the West, but rather think that ISIL and Al-Quaeda are providing the aid. After ISIL allegedly beheaded James Mark Foley, United States immediately started using the beheading to drum up support for its bombing campaign against Syrian government. But when Foley was first abducted, it was reported that its captors were the Syrian government itself. Of course, since people have attention span of a goldfish (and that is being generous), the lie was not noticed by the general public. ISIL is being used to supplant Teheran-friendly governments now controlling most of the Middle East, and with its holdings being across Syria and Iraq, any campaign to eradicate ISIL from Iraq can easily spill into Syria. Turkey itself has already considered staging a false flag attack to justify invading Syria. In 2014 Turkey expanded the airlift of weapons to radical islamist groups, and United States started directly providing weapons. And now, Israel and Turkey are coordinating air strikes with islamic jihadists in Syria. Many of these jihadists have already been involved in overthrow of the Libyan government. And if Iran reacts to US’ provocative actions, then the US Empire (NATO) will be free to attack Iran.
It is already hard to call the war in Syria a “civil” war. The entire war is driven from abroad, as Syria has major ties to Russia that the West wants to sever. The Muslim Brotherhood, created by the British Empire after it left Syria, tried – with the Western backing – to overthrow Syrian President Hafez al Assad in 1970s and 80s. After they were scattered, their remnants formed a new US-Saudi initiative – the Al-Quaeda. The entire reason ISIL was so successful in Syria and Iraq is because of a massive support from abroad. Saudi Arabia and NATO have openly armed and supported the islamic radicals in Syria from the beginning. This support included chemical weapons (sarin) which Al-Nusra used to murder at least 500 civilians in Ghoutta in 2013. Russians have, since the start of their involvement, been bombing convoys going from and to Turkey, supplying the Islamic State (sarin was also provided via Turkey). As early as 2005, Western death squads have been operating in Syria. Robert Ford has, relatively recently, been travelling through Syria and meeting with terrorists – dubbed “protestors” by the Western media. French agents acting as mercenaries / death squad participants had been captured by the Assad government early on in the “rebellion”, back when the Western media were still spinning a story about “peaceful protesters” (who were already extremely well armed and prone to shooting people). Pentagon was not too pleased about Russia bombing the terrorists and attempting to establish an air base in Western Syria, and even less so about Russia, Syria, Iraq and Iran sharing intelligence in their efforts against ISIL – despite (or more likely, because) the fact that it would allow more effective attacks on ISIL. It also didn’t like the S-300 launchers protecting the Syrian army from NATO air attacks.
If Western terrorists manage to take power in Syria and Iraq, it will be a repetition of the Libyan scenario. In Libya, after taking power, terrorists immediately restricted freedoms, introduced Sharia law and started ethnic cleansing. Many of them have immediately afterwards travelled from Libya to Syria, often through Turkey.
Immediately after the Paris attacks, US have quietly passed the worst anti-privacy bill after the Patriot act. CISA gives corporations legal immunity when sharing consumers’ private data with the government. It also means that corporations will hand information directly to law enforcement and intelligence agencies, thus bypassing the Department of Homeland Security. Law was passed in good part thanks to lobbying by the corporations themselves, as they recognized major profit opporitunities. Since the bill was included directly into the spending package, only option other than passing the bill was shutting down the government. Corporate-controlled media are keeping silent on it, and terror attacks that occupied public attention provided an ideal opportunity.
West has used islamic terrorism for very long time. It had been used to destabilize states along the Soviet, now Russian, periphery. It has been used to create instability and fear in US and Europe, thus allowing oligarchs to push for fascist police states ruled by the corporations. West used islamists to both eject USSR from the Afghanistan, to overthrow Muamer Gadaffi and now to attack Al Asssad. In all cases, a large evil had been replaced with even larger one. This fits the agenda of pushing through globalization, denationalization and culturocide policies now so popular in the West. Terrorism in the Middle East will also allow an invasion of Syria and reinvasion of Iraq, two countries where Iran and Russia have gained influence, and remove said influence from the picture. Overall goal is a creation of a chain of subject states around the Russia and China.
Naturally, corporate media are not reporting on any of this. TTIP is not being reported on by any of the major media in the West, and those same media are also ignoring all anti-TTIP efforts and protests. ABC, NBC and CBS have not mentioned TPP (TTIPs sister agreement) at all between August 2013 and February 2015, a period of seventeen months. Fox News and CNN each mentioned it only once. Network Evening news completely ignored it. Reason is simple: media’s corporate owners, backers and advertisers do not want these agreements to be mentioned. Only PBS News Hour mentioned the TPP during eight broadcasts, most of them substantive discussions of the agreement. Only MSNBCs Ed Show mentioned TPP multiple times. CISA, the worst anti-privacy bill since the Patriot act, passed without media saying a word, despite its outright endorsement of a fascist police state. Same goes for the events in Syria (which are part of the same grand plan), where the media are pushing the patently ridiculous official version of events, without even mentioning – let alone adressing – all the illogicalities and contradictions it contains, or any proof that goes against the official version. In-depth analysis of events is all but absent.
Is capitalism with human face possible? It definetly is, but some major changes have to be made. It won’t be easy, and capitalists first have to be removed from their seats of power. But people have been so indoctrinated that they do not realize what is happening. Many in the US may see this article as an attack on United States themselves, not realizing that they have had their democracy stolen from under their nose, and that US Government, for very long time now, no longer represents people but instead represents corporate stockholders. Situation is not very different in other major countries (UK, France, Germany, Italy), and even in small countries, only difference is that politicians are representing foreign, as opposed to domestic, capitalists. Democracy is a lie, and so it will stay, unless people wake up. But most people apriori reject anything which does not fit their preconcieved notions, and this article is likely to leave sour taste in many. It did to me, as research I did on it confirmed my worst fears about false flags and dissolution of democracy, fears I sincerely hoped were unfounded. Coincidence Theorists will reject all the evidence shown as “bad luck”, “coincidence” and “nonexisting connections”. It might have convinced me after 9/11 attacks (and it actually did – for a long time I rejected 9/11 conspiracy theories as unlikely, albeit never as impossible). But 9/11 New York, 7/7 London and recent Paris attacks have too much in common, with too many elements unexplainable by conventional explanations, to be simply dismissed as doings of raving lunatics.
Important web sites