On AviationIntel F-22 vs Typhoon article
Posted by picard578 on November 24, 2012
http://aviationintel.com/2012/07/28/in-response-to-reports-of-simulated-f-22-raptor-kills-by-german-eurofighters/
While author is indeed correct that training sorties do not necessarily mean that one type of aircraft is superior, multiple sorties can, when analyzed properly and assuming that setup is known, provide some information about respective fighter’s capabilities.
Huge control surfaces and thrust vectoring are useful for high-altitude and low-speed maneuvers, not in types of maneuvers required for close-in combat (transsonic low-altitude maneuvers). In fact, thrust vectoring is dangerous as it bleeds off energy, leaving fighter defenseless if it does not manage to get a kill immediately upon using it Secondly, German Typhoons in the exercise had no helmet-mounted sights, and as such had to point nose at F-22s to get a lock.
Modern radar warners, such as those carried by the Typhoons, are very capable of detecting even newest LPI radars. In any scenario where IRST-less Typhoon and F-22 went against each other with no AWACS support, both sides would be limited to visual detection.
In the end, visual-range combat is more likely than not to be decisive between fully equipped 4,5-th/5-th generation aircraft. As such, while F-22 is a capable dogfighter, it cannot be counted on to have a major impact in a war due to high cost and low sortie rate.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
This entry was posted on November 24, 2012 at 3:16 pm and is filed under news.
Tagged: aviation, Commentary, EF-2000, Eurofighter, Eurofighter Typhoon, F-22, F-22 Raptor, Luftwaffe, News, performance, Raptor, Red Flag, Red Flag 2012, Red Flag Alaska, stealth, thrust vectoring, Typhoon, typhoons, United States, USAF. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
On AviationIntel F-22 vs Typhoon article
Posted by picard578 on November 24, 2012
http://aviationintel.com/2012/07/28/in-response-to-reports-of-simulated-f-22-raptor-kills-by-german-eurofighters/
While author is indeed correct that training sorties do not necessarily mean that one type of aircraft is superior, multiple sorties can, when analyzed properly and assuming that setup is known, provide some information about respective fighter’s capabilities.
Huge control surfaces and thrust vectoring are useful for high-altitude and low-speed maneuvers, not in types of maneuvers required for close-in combat (transsonic low-altitude maneuvers). In fact, thrust vectoring is dangerous as it bleeds off energy, leaving fighter defenseless if it does not manage to get a kill immediately upon using it Secondly, German Typhoons in the exercise had no helmet-mounted sights, and as such had to point nose at F-22s to get a lock.
Modern radar warners, such as those carried by the Typhoons, are very capable of detecting even newest LPI radars. In any scenario where IRST-less Typhoon and F-22 went against each other with no AWACS support, both sides would be limited to visual detection.
In the end, visual-range combat is more likely than not to be decisive between fully equipped 4,5-th/5-th generation aircraft. As such, while F-22 is a capable dogfighter, it cannot be counted on to have a major impact in a war due to high cost and low sortie rate.
Share this:
Like this:
Related
This entry was posted on November 24, 2012 at 3:16 pm and is filed under news. Tagged: aviation, Commentary, EF-2000, Eurofighter, Eurofighter Typhoon, F-22, F-22 Raptor, Luftwaffe, News, performance, Raptor, Red Flag, Red Flag 2012, Red Flag Alaska, stealth, thrust vectoring, Typhoon, typhoons, United States, USAF. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.